Showing posts with label Brand IAS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Brand IAS. Show all posts

Friday, January 2, 2015

EEE Chief Mentor Shri K Siddratha Interview with ATN Channel

Earth Eduvision Ensemble is committed to shape your Dreams into Reality.  

With its vision to become a pre-eminent educational group that works towards the overall enhancement of the society by enabling the brightest minds of the country to achieve what they aspire for and what they ought to have, EEE’ straining programmes aim at creating a strong foundation of academic knowledge and personal skills which empower our students to stand out in the competition and choose Civil Services, niche management jobs, top echelons of Journalism as well as Higher Academics with confidence.



Becoming successful is a complex outcome of one’s intellectual development and skill-sets but one cannot perfect it without strategy and attitude. We help students explore their full potential, boost their self-confidence and help them realize their dreams by the advanced system of teaching and training process. 
Our faculty is comprised of renowned scholars in every field, and our curriculum utilizes the latest teaching methods and learning tools, including simulations. In our research and teaching, we are educating the next generation of leaders with the firm conviction that business can and must be a force for good in the world.

Thursday, July 3, 2014

IAS topper Gaurav Agrawal's mother Interview with ETV


More happy today than when he was born: IAS topper Gaurav Agrawal's mother 


For the first time in four years, a man has topped the prestigious Civil Services Examination, results for which were declared. Gaurav Agrawal is 30-years-old and has a computer science degree from IIT Kanpur and a Post Graduate Diploma in Management from IIM Lucknow, where he was a gold medalist.

Wednesday, July 2, 2014

The present selection system: Its limitations & relevance for good governance

A good governance requires an efficient, coherent, amicable and smooth functioning of the coordination between the executive, legislator, judiciary and the civil services, supported by an awakened, enlightened and well informed citizens. The people select someone to represent themselves in an election mandate who frames policies for the welfare of the people, which is in accordance with the law or not, is analysed by the judiciary and then implemented by the government servants called civil servants.

In order to implement the policies of the government, the chosen civil servants require to behave in a holistic manner having an idea about everything happening around them, so that they can administer the policies taking almost everything or maximum number of variables into account. Thus, these civil servants are not required to be any specialists rather they require to know something about everything, i.e., they are required to be generalists, who form the army of bureaucrats who supposedly 'run (or ruin)' the administration of the country.

The bureaucracy has to dispense certain duties, handle a lot of responsibilities, help in governance, help frame policies of the government and that too with a feeling towards the countrymen,  so that the policies bring about a holistic upliftment of the society and do all these require certain qualities. The bureaucracy requires a combination of human traits, personality traits and attitudinal traits.

The identification of the bureaucratic tests, abilities, capabilities, its testing and ultimately its selection is done through a system of examination promoted by the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC).
The UPSC tries to identify whether the candidates possess the desired qualities or not and on that basis recommends them to the Ministry of Personnel Affairs for their induction into Civil Services.

Had it been that the selection process of the UPSC would have been infallible, the chosen government servants would have been patriotic, intelligent, efficient, hard working, visionary, sensitive and understanding. However, the present corp of officials far from showing these qualities rather excel in qualities which are completely reverse and on the extreme.
They come to earn money, which they start doing right from their early stage, they have a bloated ego, which gets a boost by qualifying and subsequently oil massaged in the administrative setting, they come with minimum feelings about the country which becomes dead.

Obviously then, something is wrong somewhere. There is a thorough mismatch between what is required, what is desirable, what type of government servants we get and how they work. The qualities that are desired of them, whether they have been tested, checked or is that, that they are picked up for wrong qualities.
An attempt in the following paragraphs is being made to understand these anomalies and make some suggestions for sustainable governance of the country.

To begin with, the civil servants don't require to be genius, intelligence is enough. A genius has its own ways, his/her thinking is completely out of the world. Genius are not part of the general masses, they do not care for the world and can be out and out a revolutionary. An intelligent person allows his logic and intuition to function in a balanced manner. He knows when actually to use his intuitive abilities and his logic. The present examination system particularly the Prelims lays more emphasis on the retentive capability, rather than on intelligence but its Mains examination has a good mixture of intelligence and retentive power capability. Indeed the people chosen are intelligent, talented, but whether they use their talent and intelligence for the right cause or not, leaves a lot to be desired.

Language for bureaucracy is not merely a test of only the reading and writing ability but a means of communication. It emboldens the bureaucrats' ability to draft letters, understand legality, communicate what is to be communicated to the masses without causing any offence, and prompt the reader to think beyond words. Language has never been the most important test for the bureaucracy, however at two levels of examination the ability of the candidates to communicate used to be checked-- the Mains level and the Interview level. Since the Mains answer require the candidates to faithfully reproduce rather than think originally, therefore to what extent the language was tested remains a question mark. Some interview boards go on to become quizzical. Consequently, their efficacy in testing the communication skill and language also remains to be seen. The induction of essay has been a good attempt to check the language of the candidates, and its comprehension ability. Still, the questions in the Mains require to test the analytical capability to a greater range by inducting complexities and to test the conclusive range of the candidates.

As part of the recent changes in the civil services examination system the welcome development has been the introduction of Interpersonal skill, including communication skill as part of CSAT. CSAT is an appreciable effort for the reason that the qualified candidates of the Services will not be required to be taught English language (Some four IFS candidates who though having qualified and not able to comprehend English had to be taught English separately for one year) and the non-expressive one will be eliminated right in the beginning.

One of the most important administrative traits is the organisation of thoughts and the capability to organise the thoughts. The more organised the thought of a person, the better are the possibilities of his becoming a better administrator. If not in the PT, surely in the Mains examination, and in the Interview the unorganisation of thoughts become a major hindrance. The candidate in no way can clear the Mains examination without this ability.

Only when the thoughts are organised, can there be any enhancement of analytical ability and that always helps a better judgement after a solid comprehension. The prelims test has introduced such questions and enlarged their numbers in the question paper as well.


However, the real test of analysis comes in the Mains. Fortunately, the scope of analytical questions has increased over the last two years to such an extent that the civil services examination has ceased to be only a test of reproduction. Some interview boards also test candidates’ ability to analyse but most of them still go on to be quizzical. After all, a quizzical interview is so easy, less strenuous and requires virtually no quality interviewer. Analysis, helps one to convert information into knowledge or use the tool of information for knowledge. Knowledge is the capability of using information, learning for a value based judgement on what is wrong and right, what is good and bad, what is desirable and undesirable, what is view and vision, and whether it is better to be short sighted, visionary or to be blind. 
Unfortunately, knowledge is not really subjected to any realistic assessment at any stage of candidate's qualification scheme of things, as the perspective base of candidates is not subjected to any value based assessment. A selected candidate devoid of wisdom is bound to be poor in decision making, has to be short-sighted and irrational.

Even with a diverse perspective base, the candidate can be objective in thinking ready to balance perception. Any lack of balance of perception is bound to make the officer partial, show a lot of biases take a sectarian view, ally themselves easily to any ideology, political party and view.


No test has been designed for checking the balance of perception and objectivity of the candidates in their thinking. Needless to say, the present corp of bureaucrats show every type of bias, sectarianism, casteism, regional bias and what not. 
The UPSC could have better thought of advancing its thinking on CSAT as previously thought of, where it sought to check in the candidates’ "ethical, moral and analytical dimension in decision making" but the present form of CSAT is a good departure from its previous motive of testing ethic and morality.

The form of testing of ethics and morality is nowhere visible in the present format. Although it must be said that a design of test to check the ethics and morality in the candidates aptitude couldn't have been too difficult to assess and check. Asking the candidates to choose between "Monsoons are uncertain" and "Monsoon are unpredictable" and "Monsoon show high degree of spatial and temporal variation" would have indicated the candidates approach towards nature – whether critical or appreciative, whether ethical or consumerist.

In turn such a designed test with the help of certain questions would have indicated the feelings of the candidate towards either nature or fellow human beings such a question would have a choice in the form of "A train accident killed 70 people or "70 talents of country, or 70 families devastated because of train accident"
Indeed, the bureaucracy must have a fair degree of sensitivity along with talent. Bureaucracy must be picked from the best in the country. Talents are easy to spot and identify. But it is difficult to find and identify candidates sensitive  and benevolent vision for our country. The country's governance is bad not because of talents but because of the attitude of the bureaucracy. It is  attitude that would have determined the progress of the country. Well being of oneself, positive thinking, progressive nature and the ability to identify and respect others as well as one's own talent comes with attitude.

Attitudes have hardly been studied and/or they have got any precedence over talent. Talents can be spoilt brats, attitudes are always rational. 
Inability to have an attitudinal test or to design one or the lack of willingness has determined the dearth of attitude in the administrative manpowers.

A leadership trait in bureaucracy will help the bureaucracy take a lot of lead in initiative building, mobilising people, association building, developing consensus for far fetched concepts, furnish thinking and consequently improve the predictive power of the candidates. Incidentally none of these traits are associated with the present bureaucracy. They are perceived as leaders by virtue of the powers they hold, or they have, or the perception they build around them, or their subordinates who protect them to such an extent. They are not leaders by virtue of having it as one of the personality traits.

The present system of examination does not seek to test the leadership qualities of the candidates. Had it been, the initial screening would have been done on the lines of SSB, a complete picture of the perspective candidates would have emerged of the candidates who really had (the leadership qualities) in them. An examination system that is ostensibly meant to select the cream of the candidates from the country, grossly lacks on this count. The Prelims checks the information capability of the candidate, the Mains examination checks the candidates’ ability of to reproduce fact, the Interview of 30 minutes duration hardly gives correct information about the candidate.


Had the present system of examination with a Prelims-Mains-Interview combination been very effective, we could have hardly seen the type of inefficient, incapable, short-sighted, corrupt and psychological dented bureaucracy.

The present CSAT related reform ostensibly to check the aptitude of the candidate must not be a departure from the initially thought out plan of testing, "ethical, moral and analytical dimensions in decision making." What the reform in prelims examination means or intended to mean can be known only when the Preliminary examination takes place with the new pattern. It will prove how far the Union Public Service Commission is sincere in its efforts to really design and bring out a test which could choose a bureaucrat with moral and ethical value, required at the crucial time that the country is passing through with scams in all the fronts…… be it telecom sector, banks, commonwealth games, space or judiciary…….and many more.

In the Main examination, there is an urgent need to reframe the syllabus and its content change alongwith a change in the way the questions are asked, so that the candidates who can only faithfully reproduce facts can be weeded away, and encourage good amount of thinking among the candidates so that they assimilate, account for and analyse the situation, circumstance an the setting. Some subjects like that of literature and some social science subjects must not be encouraged, as they deter any improvement in the imaginative power, analytical capability of the prospective candidate or to infuse fresh thinking.


The scope of personality test have to be increased/ improved further and its weightage must – must be  increased in terms of marks and its form changed to SSB type or evolve a dynamic, as well as customised variant so that in five-six days of time it really tests, the attitude and talent of the candidate that is not fake and which the candidate cannot camouflage.

Brand IAS

The collector is surrounded by a beehive of peons and never moves anywhere within the district without a phalanx of sidekicks. At every village he (or increasingly she) will be garlanded like a film star with carnations, jasmine or marigolds.
A white Ambassador car with a red-light comes to a village. The entire villagers flock to the car. They try to peep into the car, a person alights from the car with an expressionless face, stiff nose, nonsensitive body language.


You take a problem to the concerned department. You are made to wait for an hour or two, despite the person you have to meet is engaged nowhere. Finally after being thoroughly irritated you get to meet someone who has been entrusted the task of solving your problem. While you narrate your problem, the person is hardly lend his ears to you, keeps passing judgement off and on and the fag end of the discussion says, "I will see what 'I' can do." Mark the heavy emphasis on ‘I’.

Consider the description of this plight "At the state government's home ministry in Bangalore after applying for verification, I was told (even after 3 months of my application) that my marriage certificate verification was stuck in Mysore (where my marriage was earlier registered). I had to go to the Mysore Police Commissioners office who directed me to a local police station; from there I was directed to the Marriage registry office and from there back to the local police station. The cop in-charge in local police station (they were finally able to pin a man whose job this actually was) was on rounds somewhere else, so we were told to go there. On reaching that place the cop sent me back to Police station, after a quite a bit of waiting (in a state of rising blood pressure) I got my work done. I then went to Police Commissioners office with the required document and as per rules was accompanied by a policeman; lest I manipulate the document (I wish they showed this dedication from the start). After a week, I finally picked up the document from Bangalore's home ministry after the mandatory handing in of some 'tea and biscuit money' to a clerk."

"A train accident takes place. Scores of people have died. There is chaos all around. Everyone running here and there. If immediate action is not taken even more people will lose their life and lose it well. Ultimately army is called to aid administration. The Administration cannot manage it…….."

Now consider -- China recently completed the final section of the pan-Himalayan Golmud-Lhasa railway (1956 kilometres) at 5072 metres above sea level. The final section of 1142 kilometres, running across Tibet's snow-covered plateau-dubbed the roof of the world--presented some unusual difficulties. The engineers had to contend with building on a 550-kilometre frozen belt, with the snow alternately melting and freezing in summer and winter. Workers had to breathe bottled oxygen to cope with the high altitudes and there was not a single death due to this. This stretch of 1142 kilometres was completed in a mere four years.Or consider Phase I of Shanghai's Pu Dong Airport. A four kilometre runway, two parallel taxiways, an 800,000-square-metre apron, twenty-eight boarding bridges, 280,000 square metres of terminal building and 50,000 square metres of cargo warehouse space designed to fly twenty million passengers, 750,000 tonnes of cargo and 126,000 flights a year- all these were completed between October 1997 and September 1999.

This gave the Chinese technicians eight international patents in the manufacturing of high-tech girders. The economic development, political integration and social pride that projects such as these engender for China and its far-flung people are all too obvious to elucidate.

Cut to India. Impressive as the completion of the Konkan Railway or the Delhi Metro Railway have been, they pale in comparison to the Chinese projects, especially where implementation skills and political will are concerned. Consider the statistics. It took seven to ten years to complete the 760-kilometre Konkan Railway. As for the Delhi Metro, between 1950 and 1990, some thirty feasibility studies were carried out by various bodies to evaluate an alternative transportation system for Delhi. The final go-ahead came in 1990 after a long gap of forty years. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited was established in 1995 and it took the first phase of eleven kilometres to be completed in 2004 after a long span of nine years. The eighteen-kilometre Calcutta Metro took a good twenty-four years to complete, from 1971 to 1995.

Our new expressways, the golden Quadrilateral included, are perennially in a state of half-finish. One or the other side of the throughways is being laid or else under litigation at any given time. It is common for us to see a part of a road dug up one fine morning. And it is actually common to see that road in exactly the same state even after we return from our summer vacation, when in most other countries such works are carried out practically overnight.

A private organisation planned, prepared, executed the modernisation of the Chhatrapati Shivaji airport in Mumbai with the type of difficulty unimaginable. The modernisation process of the fully functioning and very congested airport was like, "performing an open heart surgery on a running person in the midst of his marathon.
The government cannot perform, or replicate this, can only feel jealous of the performance.

The one common in all the failures is IAS, the one common in all obstacles in the IAS, the one problem in all of them IAS…….Say hello to the IAS, the epitome of inefficiency, apathy corruption, arrogance and mental sickness.

A district magistrate and a junior engineer both are abducted by Maoists. Both are treated well. The entire limelight is hogged by the District Magistrate, no one is concerned about the fate of junior engineer at all.
That is the Brand IAS…..

 Brand IAS: A superbrand, that is supercorrupt, superarrogant, superapathetic superinsensitive brand value of IAS. The name itself evokes all hatred, and all exclusivity. How this brand is made, what makes it run, what type of awe and aura it weilds, its a lesson in itself and can put some of the best superbrands to shame.
The IAS are a breed apart.

The IAS are a part of All India Services created by the Constitution of India under the previsions of Article 311 & 312.

Article 311(1) provides that no person who is a member of a civil service of the Union or an all-India service or a civil service of a State or holds a civil post under the Union or a State shall be dismissed or removed by an authority subordinate to that by which he was appointed.

According to Article 311(2) no such person as aforesaid shall be dismissed or removed or reduced in rank except after an inquiry in which he has been informed of the charges against him and given a reasonable opportunity of being heard in respect of those charges.

Provided ………..and a series of conditions for that.
The Politician come and go….. politician go back to the people every five years to get a mandate to represent the people…… if at all they can get the mandate. But the bureaucracy once inducted become permanent entity. They have no accountability, responsibility, no love for people, for country. One action of politician can cost their image may be their rejection, as well, in re-election but no such penalty is awarded to the bureaucracy. They can do everything without being answerable at all to anyone.

 The bureaucracy is an extension of the British rule in India. The bureaucracy was an instrument to control India from Britain, consequently variety of rules and laws that were framed, were framed essentially for perpetuating the Britain interests. These rules, these provisions that were exploitative in nature still persists.

The bureaucracy have  the best of both worlds-- one side illiterate poor citizens on whom they have to apply and implement themselves and at the other side their representative-gullible, ill-informed and who can be easily fooled. Protected by a constitutional provision and supported by the same provision that were made for the colonial civil servants, from the beginning of their training period onwards they move with their colonial mindset of looking down upon everything. And, if they don't look down upon they are elevated, praised, eulogised, made a hero, publicised, composed   a song….. what not. Always a win win situation. If they do not do anything (delay their job), don't respect people, country law, protocols, they satisfy their ego; if they do something that is their valid, legal duty, for which they are paid, they are elevated to demi God status, as if they have done something by sacrificing their entire career, their entire family, have been completely selfless.

Brand IAS as you call it... by virtue of the constitutional position they control finance they sign the cheques, they delegate the govt work. Obviously they decide who has to share the Govt's responsibility, so it will not suit them if they are not judgemental and if they do not follow their whims and fancies. Agreed, one has to be judgemental to dispense the finance, provided one is capable of being judgemental in the present world with specialisation and super specialisation.

Whims, fancies don't have a place in a rational world, and in an age of dialogued where do we stand for being judgemental.

The Indian administrative service is meant to serve the society. They are civil servants not civil masters, they are not for dispensing favours which is the true right of the citizens, bestowed by the constitution. Brand IAS never serves only dispenses favours but only from where they can get a favour back. The favour is always a favour in favour of favouring ?

To hell with the country, people or the image of the country. By virtue of their position and the constitutional provision they have, Brand IAS is identified  by a very specific set of work culture. They are world leaders in inefficiency, a symbol of   inactivity, overjealous of every thing and highly prejudiced. Despite their main job being co-ordination, they will be the last people in the earth to do so. They may have to swallow a lot of their pride in asking for the best of services despite the fact that they know the quality of service one can obtain. The fact that the Govt has to withdraw from the IAS a good amount of money which they have kept for either investment or for public welfare at that last moment because it has remained unused, unutilised, speaks highly of the inefficiency. To imagine that the government has earmarked funds for some provision that lies utilised and utilised in the most hurried manner possible, with total disregard to the priority the management and work culture is known to be believed.

Brand IAS spends the hard earned money of the exchequer not because they have to be spend on something that was earmarked but because it has to be somehow spent. If there can be any parallel of this type in the entire world, one can rate the Indian Administrative System as the best in inefficiency.

Apart from the inefficient work culture, they promote brand IAS which has a very distinct set of identity, with the help of which they set them apart from the rest of ‘Indians’. They portray themselves as if they are aliens brought from a planet, which is out of our solar system, milky way and this universe. The qualities that set them apart is their arrogance, ego, overjealous nature and loads of sycophants for this ego massage. They can't behave like normal people because they consider themselves as 'supernormal' (read abnormal). They programme their entire software in a very mechanical manner, they have set for themselves a specific set of protocol which they follow in order to make themselves different from others.

The public perception of IAS is very well managed (read manipulated). The subordinates help their masters in 'awe', "Hamare sahab bahut paisa kamate hain", general public perceives "kitna Achha chor hai, paisa bhi kamata lekin  kam bhi karata hai."

The media is so awe struck by these immortal people. India today came out with an issue on some achievers. More than 70% of which were IAS officers. It is a very queer situation to eulogise IAS offers. Imagine a person with all authority in the world, with all money and funds at their disposal want to do some work, want to innovate, which, if fails won't be held accountable, consequently can take infinite risks. Out of 20,000 old officers if some 10-11 of them became successful, will that be considered an achievement? And the media raises enormous hooplah on the transfer of the bureaucracy.

And what a publicity have they done over Anil Verma, Alok Ranjan Jha and S.V. Krishna. No one ever enquired about the whereabouts of the junior engineer who was also abducted along with R.V. Krishna, as if junior engineers are no human beings or their life is less costly than IAS officers. Brand IAS that is its value!

Superbrand IAS, if they have to describe themselves will say I am super because I am in Indian Arabpati Service and despite doing everything nefarious and evil I Am Safe. Despite the fact that I wreck the country from within by doing wrong work and no work, I will never feel that I Am Sorry.

By K. SIDDHARTHA
Chief Mentor Earth Eduvision Ensemble